Editorial Policy

How we create content

Our content is drafted with the assistance of AI tools to structure information clearly and consistently. AI is used as a drafting aid only — it never publishes directly.

Human editing

Every AI-assisted draft is edited by a member of our team. We check it for clarity, tone, factual accuracy, and alignment with our sources before it goes any further.

Named clinical review

Clinically significant content is reviewed by Dr Miriana Vrajitoriu, Consultant Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist (Refocus The Brain Hub). Clinical review confirms that medical statements are correct, balanced, and consistent with current best practice. Reviewed pages carry a visible “Medically reviewed by” line with the reviewer’s name and the date of last review.

Our sources

We base clinical statements on authoritative, publicly accountable sources, including:

• The National Health Service (NHS)
• The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
• The World Health Organization (WHO)

Screening tools referenced on this site (such as the ASRS v1.1 and AQ-10) are validated instruments; they indicate whether a full assessment may be worthwhile and are not a diagnosis.

Corrections

If you believe something we have published is inaccurate or out of date, email hello@thinkbetteruk.com. We review every correction request, fix confirmed errors promptly, and update the “last reviewed” date on the affected page.

Review cadence

Clinically significant pages are reviewed at least every 12 months, and sooner when guidance from the NHS, NICE, or WHO changes materially. The date of the most recent review is shown on each reviewed page.